Legal Opinion

Commerce Bank of St. Louis, N.A. v. Findley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1994No. 63576PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Third-party plaintiff Barbara Findley appeals judgment in favor of third-party defendant James Findley on claims for contribution and indemnification. Commerce Bank brought the original suit against five of six makers of a promissory note. James Findley was the only co-maker not sued by Commerce. Barbara and James Findley were makers on the promissory note, along with two other married couples. The Findley’s marriage was dissolved and the couple’s interest in real estate encumbered by the promissory note secured by a deed of trust was awarded to Barbara Findley. Summary judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Wilson v. Midstate Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Landmark KCI Bank v. MarshallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Transwestern Industries, Inc. v. ShueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Lock v. LaFeversMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colombo v. BufordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Runny Meade Estates, Inc. v. Datapage Technologies International, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API