Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ex Parte Emmons

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1983No. 69218Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTeague, Judge

I believe that the majority orders the wrong person to be punished for what has happened in this cause. To “abuse” Johnny Haywood Emmons, applicant, will be doing a useless act. If anyone should be punished, it is Johnny J.E. Meadows, a person whom I do not know. The record, however, informs me that Meadows is the person who prepared the application for writ of habeas corpus that Emmons signed, swore to,* and filed in this cause. The record also reflects that Meadows, who is in the penitentiary, holds himself out to other inmates as being “a writ writer.”

The record completely demonstrates…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. In the Matter of the Alleged Contumacious Conduct of Clovis Carl Green, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. Childress v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API