Legal Opinion

Moberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 2010No. 1767 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FLAHERTY.

Kathleen Moberg (Claimant) petitions for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying her Claim Petition. We affirm.

Claimant filed Claim Petition against Twining Village (Employer), a retirement community, alleging she sustained an injury in the course and scope of her employment on April 12, 2006. Claimant asserted that as a condition of employment, she was required to have a tuberculin test. She alleged that after undergoing the test, she had an adverse…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Hoffmaster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Senco Products, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Nevin Trucking v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marazas v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. North Pittsburgh Drywall Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Department of Labor & Industry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Lin & Eastern Taste)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. PPL v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Simko v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API