Mantesta v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DOWNEY, Judge.
The issue before us in this appeal is whether the acceptance of certain checks and promissory notes by appellant in the settlement of a medical malpractice action constitutes “payment” within the meaning of section 768.54(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), so as to trigger the obligation of the Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund to pay the covered claim. We hold that it does, based on the facts of this case.
Appellant, John Mantesta, the plaintiff below, filed and settled a medical malpractice action in which the Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund had been joined. The defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Von StetinaSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Murphy v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- United States v. Carl Jonathan NillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Florida Patient's v. St. Paul FireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roswell Capital Partners LLC. v. BesharaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011