Legal Opinion

Strome v. Lane County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 30, 2008No. 160600476; A133090PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiff sought a judgment declaring that a road running through her property was owned by her and not by defendant Lane County, and an injunction barring the county from proceeding with the process of “legalizing” the road — that is, the process of conducting a survey and issuing an order to eliminate doubts as to the road’s location and its lawful establishment as a county road. See ORS 368.201 - 368.221 (describing process); Shotgun Creek Ranch, LLC v. Crook County, 219 Or App 375, 182 P3d 312 (2008). Plaintiff argued that the county had no jurisdiction to proceed with legalizing the road…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nyman v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Butchart v. Baker CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Shotgun Creek Ranch, LLC v. Crook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Ungers' Co. v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strome v. Lane County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API