Legal Opinion

Askew v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 9, 1919No. 10289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Money xule; from city court of Newnan—Judge Post. December 13, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.

Under the rulings in the headnotes the only assignment of error which can be considered in the instant ease is the exception to the admission in evidence of a certain mortgage. As shown by the bill of exceptions, the mortgage was objected to “upon the grounds that the description of the articles sought to be mortgaged was too vague, indefinite, and uncertain, to constitute a valid mortgage.” The description of the mortgaged *772property was as follows: “I mortgage and convey to the payee and his assigns the following property, which is mine, in my possession and unencumbered: Blacksmith tools and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Jones & Damren Auto Co. v. LottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hayes v. Consolidated Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API