Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Consolidated Loan Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1957No. 36787Published

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. “The interposition of a claim commits the claimant to the fact of the making of a levy, but not to the legality of the process under which it is made,” and a claimant may move to dismiss a levy where it is for any reason fatally defective. Pearce & Renfroe v. Renfroe Bros., 68 Ga. 194 (5a). However, an uninterested person can not interpose objection to the levy of an execution (Parker v. Matthews, 106 Ga. 49, 52, 31 S. E. 784; Wheeler v. Martin, 145 Ga. 164, 88 S. E. 951). Since the claimant is not interested in the case between the plaintiff and the defendant in fi. fa., but is only…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Ansley Co. v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Nussbaum v. Waterman & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Pearce & Renfroe v. Renfroe Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Williams v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API