Legal Opinion

Charles Ash v. Board of Education of the Woodhaven School District

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1983No. 81-1597PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

• This appeal presents the question of whether the plaintiffs-appellants have a constitutionally protected property interest in receiving the full salary stated in their employment contracts. The district court found no such interest, and alternatively found that even if such an interest did exist, the plaintiffs had received sufficient procedural protections before their wages were reduced. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

I

The plaintiffs are twelve Michigan public school teachers and their collective bargaining representative, the Wayne County MEA/NEA (WCEA).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Rockwell v. Crestwood School District Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Robert C. Bannert v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Lake Michigan College Federation of Teachers v. Lake Michigan Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  5. Byron Roberts v. John Berry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Donald R. Parrett v. City of Connersville, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Dykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Cushing v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Jeffrey G. Bird v. Summit County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Armstrong v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API