Legal Opinion

Dimauro v. Linwood Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 29, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Tort to recover for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate who, it was alleged, while he was working as a laborer in a street on June 22,1906, was run over and killed by a car of the defendant because of gross negligence on the part of the motorman.

Read the full summary

Tort to recover for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate who, it was alleged, while he was working as a laborer in a street on June 22,1906, was run over and killed by a car of the defendant because of gross negligence on the part of the motorman. Writ in the Superior Court for the county of Worcester dated October 18,1906. There was a trial before Dana, J. At the close of the evidence introduced on behalf of the plaintiff, the presiding judge directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff excepted. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

We are of opinion that the evidence did not warrant a finding of gross negligence on the part of the defendant’s servants.

In view of the argument made in the case at bar we repeat what has been decided: First. It was decided in Banks v. Braman, 188 Mass. 367, that gross negligence under R. L. c. 111, § 267, is not the same thing as a wanton act which dispenses with proof by a plaintiff of the fact that his negligence was not a contributory cause of the accident. See in this connection Lanci v. Boston Elevated Railway, 197 Mass. 32, 35, and a note to Dolphin v. Worcester Consolidated Street…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Banks v. BramanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Brennan v. Standard Oil Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Fitzmaurice v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Walsh v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Ingraham v. Boston & Norther Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Adams v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API