Legal Opinion

Rogrel Maurice Washington v. Target Corporation

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 9, 2023No. 5:23-cv-01161Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ROGREL MAURICE WASHINGTON, Case No.: 5:23-cv-01161-MEMF-SHK an Individual, 11 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ORDER 12 Plaintiff, REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT v. [ECF NO. 20] AND GRANTING 13 DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota NOTICE [ECF NO. 33] 14 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 15 16 Defendants 17 18 19 20 21 22 Before the Court is Plaintiff Rogrel Washington’s Motion for Order Remanding Action to 23 State Court (ECF No. 20) and Defendant Target Corporation’s Request for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Matheson v. Progressive Specialty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API