Smith v. Alexandrian
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
IGOE,' District Judge.
This cause is now before the Court on the motion of defendants to quash summons. Since it raises an interesting .and potentially important question of the proper interpretation of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A., the Court considers it appropriate to explain its ruling. Furthermore, the position the Court feels constrained to adopt, while 'seemingly required by the language of the Rule, has not found favor with other courts which have considered the question.
The complaint sets forth a cause of ■action for personal injuries arising out 'of an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCoy v. SilerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Giffin v. EnsignCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Kappus v. Western Hills Oil, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1959
- Morgan v. HeckleDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1959
- Star v. RogalnyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larry L. Anderson, D/B/A Larry L. Anderson, Architect v. M. E. (Panama) ShiflettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Wisconsin Metal & Chemical Corp. v. DeZurik Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963
- Metropolitan Sanitary District v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
- Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962