Legal Opinion

Norvell-Wilder Supply Company v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1957No. 5207PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Chief Justice.

We overrule appellee’s motions for rehearing. In said motions certain inaccuracies in our original opinion were called to our attention. We withdraw our original opinion and substitute the following as our opinion, wherein the inaccuracies are corrected, but without changing the effect of our holding.

This was a suit by Norvell-Wilder Supply Company, plaintiff in the court below and appellant herein, against Jack Richardson, doing business as Richardson Drilling Company, defendant in the court below and appellee herein, upon a sworn account for the balance due on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joy v. National Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. American Soda Fountain Co. v. Palace Drug StoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chaq Oil Company v. Gardner MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Halco Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Gehl Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Price's Producers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Southwestern Materials Co. v. George Consolidated, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Holley v. Central Auto PartsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API