Eberli v. Cirrus Design Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
URSULA UNGARO, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on the Applicability of the Commercial Aviation Section of DOSHA [sic], filed on April 24, 2009. (D.E. 107.) Defendants Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. (“Teledyne”) and Cirrus Design Corporation (“Cirrus”) filed their respective Responses in opposition on May 14, 2009. (D.E. 126 & 125.)
THE COURT has considered the Motion and the pertinent portions of the rec ord and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. By way of background, this action arises…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Michael A. Barfield v. David Brierton, Louis Carmichael, Richard Dugger, Thomas Barton, David E. Watson, Jerry C. Wade, Randall R. Music, John ShawCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Norris v. Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020