Legal Opinion

Oado v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1935No. Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 38,396PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

December 6, 1934, the department of labor and industry made an award of compensation to plaintiff for the loss of the sight of his right eye which plaintiff asserts was caused by an industrial accident sustained by him while in defendant’s employ. Both parties are under the compensation act. Defendant reviews by certiorari.

The accident in consequence of which plaintiff asserts the right to compensation, according to his petition, “occurred on the-day of June or July, 1923but the department seems to have found that the accident occurred August 23, 1923. The exact date does not bear materially…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Ardelian v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stone v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Autio v. Proksch Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Henderson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Babcock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hirsch v. Federal Steel Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Quick v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API