Legal Opinion

Bisogno v. . New York Railways Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 17, 1920, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial. The first action was to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 17, 1920, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial. The first action was to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. The second action was by the father of the plaintiff in the first action, who was a minor, to recover for loss of services and expense occasioned by the same accident; The evidence tended to show that the…

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal in each case dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cakdozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schafer v. Norwood Equipment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
  2. Williams v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API