Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williams v. New York Central Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1930Published

1DissentTaylor, J.

I am unable to concur in this judgment of reversal

This is not a “ negligence action.” It is an action to recover damages from defendant for wantonly and willfully causing the death of one of plaintiff’s horses and seriously injuring another one. Only two disinterested witnesses (Braverman and Bush) testified that the horses were hit by the train before it stopped at the Mill street crossing; and two disinterested witnesses (John E. Mullen and Edward Mullen) testified for plaintiff that the train had stopped before the horses were in a position of danger. The jury had fair warrant for finding…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holwerson v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Freeman v. United Fruit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Bragg v. Central New England Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Munger v. . Tonawanda Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Hazle v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API