Legal Opinion · Dissent

Feil v. Greater Lakeside Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 2011No. 11-CA-92Published

1DissentChehardy, J.

Iil respectfully dissent. In my view, the trial court misapplied the law and violated the fundamental principle that gives corporations a separate legal existence from their shareholders.1

A court can pierce the corporate veil under certain circumstances, in order to reach the “alter ego” of the corporate member and hold the corporate member hable for the debts of the corporation.2 Common control or ownership, however, does not authorize a court to ignore the boundaries between two separately incorporated entities. “Before the corporate entity is disregarded on the basis it is simply the alter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Haynesville, Inc. v. Entergy Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Scientific Drilling Int'l v. Meche, 2010-0511 (La. 4/30/10)Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  3. Prasad v. BullardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Bottom Line Equipment, L.L.C. v. BZ Equipment, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Feil v. GREATER LAKESIDE CORP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API