Legal Opinion

In re Civil Investigative Demand No. 2016-EPD-36

Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County

Decided January 11, 2017No. SUCV20161888FPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Brieger, Heidi E., J.

On April 19, 2016, the Massachusetts Attorney General issued a Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) to ExxonMobil Corporation (“Exxon”) pursuant to G.L.c. 93A, §6. The CID stated that it was issued as:

[P]art of a pending investigation concerning potential violations of M.G.L.c. 93A, §2, and the regulations promulgated thereunder arising both from (1) the marketing and/or sale of energy and other fossil fuel derived products to consumers in the Commonwealth . . . ; and (2) the marketing and/or sale of securities, as defined in M.G.L.c. 110A, §401(k), to investors in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Friedman v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Massachusetts v. Exxon Mobil CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API