Legal Opinion

State v. Broomhall

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1988No. 87-045PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Defendant has appealed from an order of the district court which denied his motion for postconviction relief. Errors assigned include denial of defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel due to failure to call a key witness and failure to fully investigate and present all possible defenses during the course of his trial.

The trial judge drafted a comprehensive and analytical order which systematically answered each of the defendant’s contentions set out in his motion. As to defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel relating to the investigation and presentation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PeeryNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. BroomhallNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. FriesNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. RubekNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. LINCOLN EAST BANCSHARES, INC. v. RierdenNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ReddickNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. EllefsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. PainterNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. SchollNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API