Legal Opinion
Local 692, United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Pantry Pride, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 11, 1981No. Civ. 4-81-2008, 4-81-2198PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
Plaintiff labor organizations, Local 692 (United Food and Commercial Workers Union), Local 570 (Warehouse Employees Local), Local 355 (Truck Drivers, Helpers, Taxicab Drivers, Garage Employees and Airport Employees), and Local 117 (United Food and Commercial Workers Union) brought a consolidated action to compel arbitration under the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185, and seek a preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ordering defendant Pantry Pride to continue payment of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Frank E. Wetzel v. Ralph Edwards, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Lever Brothers Company v. International Chemical Workers Union, Local 217Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Columbia Local, American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. William F. Bolger, as Postmaster General of the United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Kraftco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Mamula v. Satralloy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Daniel J. Shannon v. Kraftco, Inc., D/B/A Sealtest Foods Division, Kraft, Inc. v. Local Union 327, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers and Taxicab Drivers, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Garland Coal & Mining Co. v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Garland Coal & Mining Company v. United Mine Workers of America, District 21, United Mine Workers of America Local 1285, United Mine Workers of America Local 1329, United Mine Workers of America Local 2071, United Mine Workers of America Local 2428, United Mine Workers of America v. Toltec Coal Company and Great Western Enterprises, Inc. Garland Coal & Mining Company v. United Mine Workers of America District 21, United Mine Workers of America Local 1285, United Mine Workers of America Local 1329, United Mine Workers of America Local 2071, United Mine Workers of America Local 2428, United Mine Workers of America, Toltec Coal Company and Great Western Enterprises, Inc. Garland Coal & Mining Company v. United Mine Workers of America District 21, United Mine Workers of America Local 1285, United Mine Workers of America Local 1329, United Mine Workers of America Local 2071, United Mine Workers of America Local 2428, United Mine Workers of America v. Toltec Coal Company and Great Western Enterprises, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985