W & J Rives, Inc. v. Kemper Insurance Group
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Aetna first assigns as error the entering of summary judgment by the trial court because Polo’s claim falls within an exclusion to the coverage provided by the Aetna policy.
“Coverage” under the policy issued by Aetna to Rives reads as follows:
2.1 COVERAGE. The company will pay on behalf of the insured the ultimate net loss in excess of the applicable underlying limit which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of
A. Personal Injury.
B. Property Damage, or
C. Advertising Offense
to which this policy applies, caused by an occurrence anywhere in the world.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Stanback v. Westchester Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- City of Greensboro v. Reserve Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- West American Insurance Co. v. Tufco Flooring East, IncCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Abt Building Products Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance Company Of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Duke University v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Eureka Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Eureka Federal Savings And Loan Association v. American Casualty Company Of Reading, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.