Legal Opinion

Charles C. Davis & Co. v. Moultrie Cotton Mills

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 21, 1934No. 23282PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A letter acknowledging the receipt of an order for the purchase of merchandise which contains the statement that “this will have our best attention” does not amount to an acceptance of the offer contained in the order, and there is not thereby created a contract of sale. Manier v. Appling, 112 Ala. 663 (20 So. 978) ; Courtney Shoe Co. v. Curd, 142 Ky. 219 (134 S. W. 146, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 903); Van Keuren v. Boomer, 143 App. Div. 785 (128 N. Y. S. 306); National Cash Register Co. v. McCann, 80 Misc. 165 (140 N. Y. S. 916). There is nothing to the contrary in Pitcher v. Lowe, 95 Ga. 423…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bauman v. McManusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Manier & Co. v. ApplingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  3. Courtney Shoe Co. v. E. W. Curd & SonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Pitcher & Manda v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Van Kauren v. Boomer & Boschert Press Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Gregory Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API