Schoenborn v. Schoenborn
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The self-represented plaintiff, Leszek M. Schoenbom, appeals from the judgment of dissolution rendered by the trial court. He claims that the court (1) abused its discretion in allocating parenting time *848between the parties, (2) improperly determined that the parties’ antenuptial agreement was not unconscionable, (3) failed to consider the earning capacity of the defendant, Maigorzata Schoenbom, in rendering its child support order, and (4) erroneously calculated the plaintiffs earning capacity. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court’s comprehensive memorandum…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. SHAKIRSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Szczerkowski v. KarmelowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Gilbert v. GilbertConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Buehler v. BuehlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3Cited by2 opinions
- CHFA–Small Properties, Inc. v. ElazazyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Tremper v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015