Legal Opinion

Borjeson v. Pilgrim Insurance

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided November 28, 2005No. 20051377BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Fecteau, Francis R., J.

INTRODUCTION

The Plaintiffs, Jeremy Boijeson (Boijeson) and Michael Capone (Capone), brought suit against Pilgrim for its denial of their claims for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits as provided under G.L.c. 90, §34M and the Massachusetts Automobile Insurance Policy. The matter is before the Court on the motion of the Defendant, Pilgrim Insurance Company (Pilgrim), for summary judgment on the Plaintiffs’ complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant’s motion is ALLOWED.

BACKGROUND

The undisputed facts viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API