Borjeson v. Pilgrim Insurance
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Fecteau, Francis R., J.
INTRODUCTION
The Plaintiffs, Jeremy Boijeson (Boijeson) and Michael Capone (Capone), brought suit against Pilgrim for its denial of their claims for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits as provided under G.L.c. 90, §34M and the Massachusetts Automobile Insurance Policy. The matter is before the Court on the motion of the Defendant, Pilgrim Insurance Company (Pilgrim), for summary judgment on the Plaintiffs’ complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant’s motion is ALLOWED.
BACKGROUND
The undisputed facts viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.