Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Gilmore v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1983No. 82-1496PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole issue presented herein is whether the Governor’s veto of Am. Sub. H. B. No. 114 was in compliance with Section 16, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, which provides in pertinent part:
“If the governor approves an act, he shall sign it, it becomes law and he shall file it with the secretary of state.
“If he does not approve it, he shall return it with his objections in writing, to the house in which it originated, which shall enter the objections at large upon its journal, and may then reconsider the vote on its passage.
“If a bill is not returned by the governor within ten days,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Edward M. Kennedy v. Arthur F. Sampson, Acting Administrator, General Services Administration, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Wright v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Harpending v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Wood v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Miller v. HurfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio General Assembly v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001
- State ex rel. Ohio General Assembly v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2007