Consolidated Television Cable Service, Incorporated v. City of Frankfort, Kentucky
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
The topography of the area in which the City of Frankfort, Kentucky, is located, is such that the inhabitants of that City generally are unable to view commercial telecasts satisfactorily through the use of ordinary antenna systems. 1
In 1952 the Electric and Water Plant Board of the City of Frankfort caused to be formed a non-stock, non-profit corporation, Community Service, Inc. (Community), for the purpose of providing a community coaxial cable antenna system, commonly called a CATV system, for at least a part of the residents of the City. 2
Some of the background facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nelson Et Ux. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Dixie Electric Membership Corporation v. City of Baton RougeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Consolidated Television Service, Inc. v. LearyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kurtis B. Borre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Consolidated Television Cable Service, Inc. v. City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Norrell v. Electric & Water Plant Board of City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Consolidated Television Cable Service, Inc. v. The City Of FrankfortCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Consolidated Television Cable Service, Inc. v. City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.