Legal Opinion

United States v. Faison

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 7, 1983No. Crim. 80-375PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIUNNO, Senior District Judge.

This case is before the court on an evi-dentiary hearing directed to be held pursuant to judgment in lieu of mandate issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and filed here July 7, 1982. That mandate vacated defendant’s conviction and remanded for further proceedings to determine whether a government witness, not available to testify at trial because of then existing physical illness or infirmity, Fed.Ev.Rule 804(a)(4), is now “available” to testify. If he is, this court was directed to grant a new trial. “If his health is such that he…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mancusi v. StubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph R. KollerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Younger v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Associates Commercial Corp. v. Reavis (In Re Reavis)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988
  4. Appeal of Faison (James Raymond)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Faison (James Raymond)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API