Shabinaw v. Brown
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentSilak, Justice
I respectfully dissent from Parts III, IV and V of the majority opinion. In my view, the Court should affirm the district court’s order granting a new trial.
With respect to the nondisclosure element (Part III A) of proving a claim based on the doctrine of informed consent pursuant to Sherwood v. Carter, 119 Idaho 246, 805 P.2d 452 (1991), the majority reverses the district court’s order granting a new trial as to the first surgery based upon the expert testimony presented by Dr. Brown, the defendant physician, which stated that nasogastric therapy was not a viable alternative to the first…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Suitts v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Sherwood v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Rook v. TroutIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Shabinaw v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.