Legal Opinion
George v. AZ Eagle TT Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 12, 2013No. CV-12-01175-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSLYN O. SILVER, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. 10). For the reasons below, the motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
Defendant owns, operates, leases or leases to others a shopping center, which is a place of public accommodation. Plaintiffs son, Michael George, is disabled as a result of muscular dystrophy, and requires a wheelchair for mobility. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff and his son are long-time customers at Defendant’s shopping center, and plan to return to the property to enjoy the goods and services offered. Plaintiff is deterred from visiting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cousins v. LockyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Macaraeg v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Macaraeg v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Seelig v. Old Vegas Manor and Estates Homeowners AssociationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021