Legal Opinion
Weil v. Kaplan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided October 27, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Final judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
In this holdover proceeding, landlord seeks to recover possession of the upstairs apartment of a two-family house. Respondent Kaplan is a month-to-month tenant. Respondent Creagh is an undertenant of Kaplan. Landlord resides in the downstairs apartment.
Respondents’ answer asserted three “counterclaims”. It asserted first that the proceeding was brought in retaliation for Kaplan’s commencement of a Supreme Court action against landlord to recover damages for personal injuries that Kaplan suffered when the stove in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- S. P. Growers Ass'n v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Toms Point Apartments v. GoudzwardNassau County District Court · 1972
- Pezzolanella v. GallowayUtica City Court · 1986
- Kew Gardens Associates v. ReganCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Port of Longview v. International Raw Materials, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Sills v. DellavalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- East 145 Co. v. BenayounAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001
- East 145 Co. v. BenayounAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001