Legal Opinion

MacBryde v. Burnett

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 4, 1942No. Civil No. 1137PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

In this case the beneficiaries in remainder of a trust fund seek an accounting from the fiduciary of the fund. Certain questions of jurisdiction and procedure have hereto^ fore been considered and passed upon. D. C., 41 F.Supp. 661. The merits of the controversy have now been heard on evidence submitted in open court including numerous exhibits.' The larger contention of the plaintiff is that the defendant, Paul M. Burnett, the president of the Monumental Life Insurance Company of Baltimore, as fiduciary of the fund, should be held accountable for profits allegedly…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Jennings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Englar v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. Schumacher v. HarriettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  5. County Commissioners v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riggs v. LowereeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. MacBryde v. BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  3. MacBryde v. BurnettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
  4. Parker v. MacBrydeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API