MacBryde v. Burnett
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The remaining question in this case is the proper division of the fund in court among three several claimants. Questions of jurisdiction and procedure have been heretofore considered and ruled upon (D. C., 41 F.Supp. 661) and the amount of the fund has been determined after hearing on the merits of the main controversy. D.C., 44 F.Supp. 833.
The fund was originally created by the will of Mary Donaldson probated in the Orphans’ Court of Baltimore City on May 27, 1920. By the second paragraph of the will the testatrix bequeathed to her niece Sara J. Parker, the “sum of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Graham v. WhitridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
- Balls v. DampmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Myers v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dow v. AtwoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
- Parker v. MacBrydeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942