Perryman Burns Coal Co. v. Mandelbaum
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.
Prior to the effective date of the Civil Practice Law and Rules I rendered an opinion (N. T. L. J., Aug. 23, 1963, p. 6, col. 5) that plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice since certain issues existed which could not be resolved upon the motion. However, I expressed therein that as to other matters no issue existed since the facts were incontrovertible. The parties now after the effective date of the Civil Practice Law and Rules submit proposed orders based upon the opinion. The defendant’s proposed order provides merely for a denial of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leach v. Ross Heater & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- John R. Alley & Co. v. Federal Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Springfield Dyeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Weber v. HertzellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Lyon v. Pennsylvania RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ernst v. ErnstNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1984