Legal Opinion

Clausen v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1931No. 20959. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marie Clausen (hereinafter designated as petitioner) filed with the Industrial Commission her claim for compensation, alleging that her husband, Louis Clausen, died as the result of an accident sustained in the course of his employment by the Bowman Dairy Company (hereinafter designated as respondent). The arbitrator held that petitioner was entitled to compensation and awarded her $19 per week for a period of 217 weeks and $2.67 for one week. The Industrial Commission, reviewing the record of the arbitrator and hearing the testimony of Dr. A.A. Goldsmith, who did not testify before the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen-Garcia Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Carson-Payson Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. W. A. Jones Foundry & Machine Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Jolly v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Cameron, Joyce & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Olin Industries, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Moergen v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Barto v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Johns-Manville Perlite Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API