Legal Opinion

Moergen v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1946No. 29463 Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Clarence Moergen, defendant in error, filed an application for adjustment of claim with the Industrial Commission, alleging that while employed by the Glidden Company, plaintiff, in error, he had become disabled from-lead poisoning. The arbitrator found he had sustained a disablement, not as, yet permanent, and awarded temporary compensation at the rate of $16.50 per week for a period of 15 weeks. Both Moergen and the company petitioned the Industrial Commission for a review, each being dissatisfied with the decision. The Industrial Commission, after hearing additional evidence, set aside the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hansell-Elcock Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Turner v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Cinch Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crepps v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Quaker Oats Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Jefferson Ice Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Boutwell v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  5. City of Collinsville v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API