State v. Hager
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Judge.
Defendant contends his constitutional right to counsel was violated in that counsel was not provided for him at a preliminary hearing. In support of this contention he cites Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 26 L. Ed. 2d 387, 90 S.Ct. 1999 (1970). In that case, the Supreme Court of the United States held that a preliminary hearing is a critical stage of the prosecution so as to constitutionally require the furnishing of counsel to protect the rights of a defendant. The case was remanded to the Alabama Supreme Court for a determination of whether the failure to provide counsel for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Gasque v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. ElledgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Buckles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994