Legal Opinion

Schmid v. Sloate

United States District Court

Decided July 17, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Collester, D. C. J.

This is an action founded upon negligence which is brought by the plaintiff to recover damages from Herbert D. Sloate and the City of Paterson which she claims to have sustained as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendants. The pertinent facts are as follows:

The plaintiff was the owner of a mortgage encumbering certain premises located in the City of Paterson which said mortgage was in default and she placed it in the hands of her attorney for the purpose of foreclosure. As a preliminary step in the proceedings, her attorney, on July 3d, 1937, made a search of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Florio v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  2. Colton v. DepewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  3. Hart v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  4. Kehoe v. Borough of RutherfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  5. Callan v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Hawkeye Oil CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API