Legal Opinion
Unified Court System v. Court Attorneys Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 2007Published
1Opinion of the Court
*607OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
The prime issue raised by petitioner’s application to stay arbitration relates to the arbitrability of respondent union’s claim to represent three newly hired attorneys designated by petitioner as “managerial/confidential.”
In December 2005, petitioner created a new title of Supervising Court Attorney (JG 32 title), which it denominated as ‘ ‘managerial/confidential, ’ ’ and hired three attorneys to serve in that position in the Surrogate’s Court in three different counties within New York City. The respondent, the recognized representative of certain…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re the Arbitration Between Board of Education of Watertown City School District & Watertown Education Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100New York Court of Appeals · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.