Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Hoffman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1966No. 5052PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Zenoff, D. J.:

Appellant, Hoyt, charged with issuing a check without sufficient funds, 1 appeals from a denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

It was stipulated that Hoyt, a retailer, owed Lester Kirn the sum of $1,876.48 for meat purchased from Kirn, who was in the wholesale meat business. The amount was carried by Kirn as an open account for almost a year until November 9, 1964, when Hoyt gave Kim a check for $773.16, apparently to apply on account. The check was not honored by the bank for lack of funds, and a month later Kim caused a criminal complaint to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McLeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Jackson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Sinclair & Sinwellan Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Joni Goldyn v. Loy HayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. State v. PlattNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. CruzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API