Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Constantine Commercial Construction, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 31, 2023No. 8:20-cv-01846Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND PAIGE HUNT and : . _ COLLEEN SMITH, , - Plaintifis, . CONSTANTINE COMMERCIAL Civil Action No. TDC-20-1846 CONSTRUCTION, — _ MICHAEL CONSTANTINE and DIANA PARSONS, Defendants. _ MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Paige Hunt and Colleen Smith have filed this civil action against Defendants - | Constantine Commercial Construction (“CCC”), Michael Constantine, and Diana Parsons, - alleging that they did not receive overtime pay to which they were entitled, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”),

29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219

(2018), the Maryland…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API