Connor v. Bjorklund
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The defendants, Paul Bjorklund (Paul) and Evelyn Bjorklund (Evelyn), appeal from a Superior Court order granting the motion of the plaintiff, Evan J. Connor (plaintiff), for new trial. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on September 24, 2003, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown, and proceed to decide the appeal at this time.…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Kurczy v. St. Joseph Veterans Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Dembicer v. Pawtucket Cabinet & Builders Finish Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
- Yammerino v. Cranston Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Skene v. BelandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Gibbs Oil Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Blue Coast, Inc. v. Suarez Corp. IndustriesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Carlew v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Crafford Precision Products Co. v. Equilasers, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Aubin v. GiffordSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Boyle v. LaurelliSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.