Richard A. Street v. George Vose, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Pro se prisoner Richard Street appeals from the sua sponte dismissal of his civil rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The district court ruled that the complaint was frivolous because Street’s claims were barred by M.G.L. c. 260 § 2A, the statute of limitations applicable to civil rights claims under Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 109 S.Ct. 573, 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989) and Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985). For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
The complaint named as defendants George Vose, former Commissioner of Corrections and Superintendent of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Morris v. Government Development BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Pedro Pino v. Patrick Ryan, Deputy Superintendent of Programs, and David Barrenger, Senior Recreation Supervisor at Washington Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- LaChapelle v. Berkshire Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Nieves v. McSweeneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Juan Rivera-Muriente v. Juan Agosto-AliceaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.