Legal Opinion

Ex Parte City of Tuskegee

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1984No. 82-1296PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

447 So.2d 713 (1984)

Ex parte CITY OF TUSKEGEE.

(In re Otto MOORE v. CITY OF TUSKEGEE).

82-1296.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 2, 1984.

Concurring Opinion March 23, 1984.

Edwin L. Davis of Gray, Langford, Sapp, Davis & McGowan, Tuskegee, for petitioner.

Edward B. Raymon of Raymon, Nathanson & Raymon, Tuskegee, for respondent.

BEATTY, Justice.

Following a hearing, Otto Moore, a police officer of the City of Tuskegee (City), was discharged by the City Council of the City of Tuskegee (Council). Moore then filed a complaint against the City, alleging that there was no substantial evidence adduced before…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HenniesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Guthrie v. CIVIL SERVICE BD. OF CITY OF JASPERCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Alabama High School Athletic Ass'n v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Goodwin v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Hudson v. SparksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. City of Mobile v. SealsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Bell v. City of Demopolis, ALCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Carter v. HarrisDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
  4. Averyt v. DoyleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Ex Parte Alabama Bd. of Pardons and ParolesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API