Hamner v. Scott
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the United States Court in the Indian Territory. Attachment by James B. Hamner against J. S. Scott. The attachment was quashed, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error, James B. Hamner, brought suit against J. S. Scott, the defendant in error, in the United States court in the Indian Territory, on certain promissory notes, and sued out an order of attachment in the action. On motion of the defendant, the order of, attachment was! quashed, and thereupon the plaintiff sued out this writ of error to review the order of the lower court quashing the attachment. The principal action is still pending in the lower court. An order quashing an attachment is not a final decision, within the meaning of the act of congress…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Standley v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Riddle v. HudginsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Robinson v. BeltCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Didier v. GallowaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1841
- Heffner v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- 21 Turtle Creek Square, Ltd. v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Crooker v. KnudsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Atlantic Lumber Co. v. Bucki & Son Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
- States v. BroudeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1924