Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Tuck
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Pearl Slay Tuck sued Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., seeking to recover compensatory and punitive damages for an injury she suffered in a fall that, she alleged, was caused by Wal-Mart's negligence. The jury returned a $40,000 verdict in favor of Tuck, and the court entered a judgment on that verdict. Wal-Mart appeals, contending: (1) that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on "affirmative creation of a hazard" when, according to Wal-Mart, there was no evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Carter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Campbell v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Maddox by and Through Maddox v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Mims v. Jack's RestaurantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Flying J Fish Farm v. Peoples Bank of GreensboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Nelson v. Delchamps, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. CaddellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Liberty National Life Insurance Co. v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.