Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Tuck

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 26, 1995No. AV93000809PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Pearl Slay Tuck sued Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., seeking to recover compensatory and punitive damages for an injury she suffered in a fall that, she alleged, was caused by Wal-Mart's negligence. The jury returned a $40,000 verdict in favor of Tuck, and the court entered a judgment on that verdict. Wal-Mart appeals, contending: (1) that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on "affirmative creation of a hazard" when, according to Wal-Mart, there was no evidence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Carter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Campbell v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Maddox by and Through Maddox v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Mims v. Jack's RestaurantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Flying J Fish Farm v. Peoples Bank of GreensboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Nelson v. Delchamps, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. CaddellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Liberty National Life Insurance Co. v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API