Legal Opinion
United States v. Ricardo Beraun-Panez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1987No. 86-3047PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Ricardo Beraun-Panez was charged with setting fire to vegetation on property owned by the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1855. Upon Beraun-Panez’s motion, the district court suppressed his statements to two law enforcement officials who failed to provide the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), before questioning him. The government appeals on the ground that Beraun-Panez was not in custody during the interrogation. We affirm.
FACTS
On September 5,1985, Beraun-Panez was herding cattle in a remote rural…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- People v. Rodney P.(Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- United States v. Leonard David GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Insook Kim, AKA in Sook KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Terry Gene CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Pau v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.