Legal Opinion

Baltimore Bridge Co. v. United Railways & Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 9, 1915PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore Oity Court. (Sopee, C. J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

The appellant, the Baltimore Bridge Company, on the 12th day of April, 1911, entered into a written agreement with the United Railways and Electric Company of Baltimore, the appellee, to do certain work, and furnish the material therefor, upon a viaduct of the appellee company known as the Huntington Avenue Viaduct, in the City of Baltimore, for which it was “to be paid for the full completion of the work: Steel work, $5,845.87; concrete floors, $453.00; concrete foundations or footings, $9.00 per cubic yard.”

By the terms of the contract the work was to be completed “within four months from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  3. Ward v. Hudson River Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Willson v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  5. Hennessy v. MetzgerIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Hammaker v. SchleighCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. United Cable Television of Baltimore Ltd. Partnership v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. G. W. McNear, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Schrier v. Beltway Alarm Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API