Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hibbing Taconite Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 21, 2010No. Civ. 09-729 (RHK/LIB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion of Defendant Hibbing Taconite Company (“Hibbing”) for an award of Attorney Fees, Expenses, and Non-Taxable Costs (Doc. No. 267) against Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “EEOC”). 1 For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be denied.
The case background is set forth in detail in the Court’s June 2, 2010 Order granting in part and denying in part Hibbing’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and need not be repeated here; familiarity with that Order is assumed. See EEOC…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Douglas Parker v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. And Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Tang v. Rhode Island Department of Elderly AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Christopher DeGroot and Steven Showalter, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Nebraska Book Company, Inc., et al.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2026
- Sabatini v. Nevada State Board of NursingDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024