Legal Opinion

K. & M. Inc. v. LeCuyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1951No. Civ. No. 17975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTLETT, J. pro tem.

This was an action brought to recover subsequent installments due April 1, May 1 and June 1 of 1949 under the provision of the same contract of sale which was the subject of Civil No. 17974, K. & M. Inc., a corporation, Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Respondent, Paul E. Tapley, Cross-Defendant and Respondent, v. George LeCuyer et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants and Appellants, ante, p. 710 [238 P.2d 28]. At the time of the trial of these actions, it was stipulated that in the event the court found for the plaintiff and cross-defendants in case Civil No. 17974,' then…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. K. & M. Inc. v. LeCuyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sieverts v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Sieverts v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API