Legal Opinion
State v. Schofield
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 8, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
Both counts upon which the defendant was convicted rest upon the provisions of General Statutes, § 6517, Rev. 1918,. now § 6365, Rev. 1930, the applicable portions thereof being that “any . . . broker or any agent . . . who shall take, purloin, secrete; or in any way appropriate to his own use . . . any of the moneys, choses in action or property in his care or custody as such . . . broker, agent ... or any moneys received by him for the sale of such . . . choses in action or property ... with intent to defraud another . . . shall be fined. . . .”
The specific offense charged in the first…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Skiff v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Gilman v. GilmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Pietrorazio v. SantopietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. GuastamachioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- State v. SalvaggioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.